Skip to content

ci: add GitHub Actions workflow for quality checks and security audit #12

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
ckrough merged 3 commits into from
Dec 22, 2025
Merged

ci: add GitHub Actions workflow for quality checks and security audit #12

ckrough merged 3 commits into from
Dec 22, 2025

Conversation

@ckrough
Copy link
Owner

@ckrough ckrough commented Dec 22, 2025

Summary

  • Adds GitHub Actions CI/CD pipeline to automate quality checks
  • Runs ruff linting, formatting checks, mypy type checking, and pytest with coverage on every push and PR
  • Includes security audit job with pip-audit (non-blocking)
  • Enforces 80% code coverage requirement
  • Integrates with Codecov for coverage reporting (optional)

Test plan

  • Verify workflow runs successfully on this PR
  • Confirm all quality checks pass
  • Validate that coverage report is generated

@ckrough
ci: add GitHub Actions workflow for quality checks and security audit
aced7b9
@ckrough
test: add tests for moderation and dependencies to reach 80% coverage
3918902 
- Add comprehensive tests for OpenAIModerator and NoOpModerator
- Add tests for authentication/authorization dependencies
- Coverage increased from 79.17% to 81.26%
@ckrough
style: fix import order in new test files
06946fb
@ckrough ckrough merged commit 616180f into main Dec 22, 2025
2 checks passed
@ckrough ckrough deleted the gallant-booth branch December 22, 2025 18:49
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

No reviews

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@ckrough